From International Paper Release
International Paper announced plans to close its paper mill operations in Franklin, VA, and its containerboard mills in Pineville, LA, and Albany, OR. The company also announced it would permanently shut down the previously idled No. 3 machine at its Valliant, OK, containerboard mill. The Valliant Mill's other two machines will continue to operate. These permanent shutdowns will reduce the company's North American paper and board capacity by 2.1 million tons.
The company concluded that we have excess capacity in our North American paper and packaging businesses, and these decisions will better match our supply with our expected customer demand.
Since the onset of the global recession, the decline in demand for International Paper's uncoated freesheet in North America has accelerated, and consequently the company has decided to further reduce its uncoated freesheet capacity.
In its containerboard and coated paperboard businesses, International Paper expects demand to resume growth as the economy rebounds. However, the company's demand is not expected to return to 2008 levels in the near future. Therefore, permanent International Paper capacity closures are necessary.
The closures will impact about 1,600 employees and will result in permanent North American capacity reductions.
Following these permanent shutdowns, International Paper will have approximately 10 million tons of North American containerboard capacity, 2.6 million tons of North American uncoated freesheet production capacity, and 1.7 million tons of North American coated paperboard capacity. These capacity shutdowns will not impact the company's ability to serve its customers.
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
2,000,000 tons and 1600 people - WOW - what an impact on our paper industry!! I also see your release on MeadWestvaco - more plants down and more workers let go - not good for America and our paper industry. Many older mills now gone - the pulp and paper landscape has certainly changed - but for the good (or not)?
Post a Comment